.

Traffic Engineer Says Finnerty's Development 'Reasonable'; Police Chief, Public Have Curbcut Doubts

More than 50 people filled the large Hearing Room at Wayland Town Building for a public hearing about a peer review traffic study of the Finnerty's redevelopment plans.

A recently completed traffic study related to the redevelopment of the Finnerty's site at 150 Main Street revealed that the project can be "safely and efficiently accommodated" provided some suggested improvements are completed, according to an independent traffic engineer.

Current plans for the development include two buildings, a CVS and a second building housing a restaurant with patio seating and office space. Entrances and exits to the development are planned on West Plain Street and Main Street.

Kevin Dandrade with TEC Inc., completed the peer review traffic study for the town of Wayland and reported his findings during a joint meeting of the Planning Board and Board of Public Works Monday night. (Read a PDF of his report.)

In particular, Dandrade said, he would not support a left-hand turn option on Main Street, but the current plan calls for a right-in, right-out option only, which Dandrade said he believes will be an effective and safe option for that corner. He said that a raised triangular island in the Main Street curbcut will direct traffic into a right-turn exit and help prevent left-turn entrances to the property.

Dandrade acknowledged that he has multiple concerns about the intersection of West Plain and Main streets, stemming from its outdated equipment and the poor alignment through the intersection from West Plain to East Plain. Still, he said corrections could be implemented with the existing equipment, and the town could later tackle a larger overhaul of the intersection.

He also recommended adding new curbing in front of the parking area of the Wayland Fire Station on Main Street, a change that Fire Chief Vinnie Smith said would require apparatus drivers to maneuver the vehicles differently, but shouldn't pose a problem.

While Dandrade said he doesn't anticipate the development to be an efficient cut-through for impatient drivers trying to avoid the traffic light, several residents spoke up to express concerns about cut-through traffic through area neighborhoods.

Because cars cannot leave the development and head directly north on Main Street, a few residents said they expect cut-through traffic to use King Street and Mitchell Street to head north.

But by far the largest concern expressed Monday night was related to pedestrian safety. Police Chief Bob Irving said he was specifically concerned about the curbcut on Main Street.

"By putting in that curbcut, we put in a spot for another conflict between pedestrians and vehicles," Irving said. "When we get to the point when we’re putting in a curbcut on a street like that, it needs a lot of thought. It’s going to have to be something that the people, especially in those neighborhoods, are going to have to live with and be comfortable with.”

But resident Doug Alongi spoke up to ask why so much concern was being directed toward this particular corner when there were several other curbcuts, noted to be dangerous by other speakers, at different points of that same intersection, including those at the Dunkin' Donuts commercial space and Liberty Pizza strip.

"I think if we’re all so concerned about the safety here, I think we should have some concerns for these other corners as well,” Alongi said.

Dermot Kelly, a traffic engineer working with developers Jesse Adelman and Matt Levy, has drafted responses to the report comments Dandrade issued. The responses include creating ADA-compliant ramps at several crossing points, moving the dumpsters to create better site lines and several other actions. (The report of the response is available as a PDF.)

"Rather than argue … I just tried to do as much as I can that he’s suggested,” Kelly said Monday night. "I basically did everything he asked for. There’s a few more things to do, but we’re really down to mitigation and what’s appropriate for that project."

No vote or action on the project was taken Monday night. The hearing was continued to Jan. 8.

wayland December 22, 2012 at 09:59 PM
@Geoff - seems like a stategy to me. The 5 or so years that the property was vacant, but owned by the Finnerty family, it was landscaped and upkeep was done. Since the property changed ownership, it has not been taken care of. Windows are broken, the fence at the corner has been down for over a year, the gutters have been ripped from the roof, there are still leaves down, and branches from the hurricane and before. So it is either a strategy by the developers to make it more of an eyesore so people will clamber for redevelopment or the owners are negligent landlords. Should we look forward to this in the future?
Bill December 22, 2012 at 10:16 PM
I have answers your question at least a dozen different Ways. We are in very familiar ground here. Try this one - if I am incorrect in my assessment then why is the planning board, design review, fire chief, economic development all in agreement with me. They are all impartial about this question and come to the same conclusion I do. How does that work?
Wayland Resident December 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM
Bill, first of all people frequently agree on incorrect conclusions. NASCAR is on network television...If you are saying that the planning board, design review board and fire chief are not critical of the project you are simply not reading the comments. That is the only way "that works". Every person/ body you named has voiced opposition to the project, but you see agreement. There is something in the equation not working.
Wayland Resident December 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM
Bill, I will say that I do respect your knowledge of the topic, although you should recognize that others also know the industry. At this point I think you have become attached to your opinion, as perhaps have I. At the end of the day, if the developers want to play the town resident card they need to do better than a CVS. Otherwise they may as well be National Development. Can we agree on that and call it a day?
Bill December 23, 2012 at 01:35 AM
We can agree on those two things – NASCAR I don’t get at all. Stock Cars running in a circle – what is the draw? We can also agree on these” Local” guys. The fact they are from Wayland has no bearing on this subject – to me anyway. The only difference is I think these guys will put their heart into this development and that will matter to most people. The only difference – National Development would have come in with the CVS only concept at the beginning and let the Town have a heart attack. Then they would have let the Town suggest the two building option themselves so it would have looked as though they were going along with it as an accommodation (that is what I would have done). I will admit, they are not as slick as the big guys – but im not sure that is a bad thing. The fact they are from Wayland has gotten in the way a little – they cannot come in over the top with a CVS only option and simply told the Town A or B – you pick!!! Again, that is what I would have done if I did not live in the Town – but then again, I am a prick when it comes to this stuff. Which is a third thing I’m sure we can agree on…. Have a good night Wayland Resident and happy holidays. Be safe…..

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »