patching...
Breaking: Car Crash Cuts Power, Sends Loker Students to Middle School »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Wayland Sees Increase in Large-Capacity Gun Permits

See how many gun permits were issued in Wayland over the past five years.

 

The Beretta 92 pistol. The SPAS-12 shotgun.

These are examples of the types of large-capacity firearms for which permits have increased 28 percent in Wayland since 2008, according to state records.

"Large-capacity" firearms are defined by the state of Massachusetts as semi-automatic handguns or rifles with the capacity of more than 10 ammunition rounds in their magazines and shotguns capable of having more than five shells.

Ownership permits for smaller-capacity firearms in Wayland have decreased over the same period of time -- from five permits in 2008 to two permits in 2012.

The number of machine gun permits in Wayland has also decreased -- by one -- since 2008. It is important to note that Massachusetts law only allows these permits to be issued to firearms instructors and gun collectors.

The numbers have emerged as state and federal officials have recently proposed new gun restrictions, and imposed others, in the wake of the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

WAYLAND LEGAL GUN OWNERSHIP RATES

Since 2008, the number of gun permits issued to Wayland residents has increased for some types of firearms but remained relatively flat for others, as shown in the chart below. 

Police departments in each Massachusetts community review and issue gun permits to anybody that applies and those statistics are forwarded to the state Executive Office of Public Safety and Security. Patch obtained the records from the EOPSS.

 

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Firearms ID Card

61

71

74

78

77

Firearms ID Card (Mace)

17

24

23

24

25

Class A, License to Carry Large-Capacity

398

443

461

470

510

Class B License to Carry, Non-Large-Capacity

5 5 4 3 2

License to Possess A Machine Gun

6

6

4

5

5

WHAT EACH LICENSE ALLOWS 

CLASS A LICENSE TO CARRY: A class A license allows a person to possess or carry all types of ammunition, handguns, rifles, shotguns and large and non-large-capacity magazines, according to the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife website. Licensees are also allowed to carry their weapon, loaded or unloaded, while concealed.

Applicants must be 21 or older, pay a $100 fee and pass a firearms safety course or hunters course. However, police departments are allowed to impose restrictions on a class A license. The permit lasts for six years.

CLASS B LICENSE TO CARRY: A class B license allows individuals to have or carry non-large capacity rifles, shotguns (large and non-large capacity) and handguns, according to the DFW website. Licensees must be 21 or older, pay the $100 fee and pass either the firearms or hunters course. Class B applicants are not subject to police restrictions and the license is valid for six years.

FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION CARD: An FID card allows individuals to have or carry non-large capacity rifles, shotguns and ammo, but not handguns, according to the DFW website. Applicants must be 18 or older, pay a $100 fee and pass either the firearms or hunters course. Police have 40 days to issue a written response after an application is filed and denials must be issued in writing. Extra conditions cannot be imposed. Also, for a $25 fee, applicants between 15 and 17 may apply, with parental consent.

Gun owners are not required to retake the safety courses to renew their licenses, according to the state website.

LICENSE TO POSSESS A MACHINE GUN: Licenses to carry machine guns (any gun capable of rapid fire shots through one trigger squeeze) are not issued in Massachusetts. Only firearms instructors and gun collectors are allowed to apply for licenses to possess machine guns.

NON-RESIDENTS: Anybody who is not a resident of Massachusetts can legally carry a non-large capacity rifle or shotgun for hunting as long as they are permitted to carry those in their home state, according to the DFW website. Non-residents are prohibited from buying ammunition in Massachusetts.

LEGAL IMMIGRANTS: As of April 30, 2012, legal immigrants can apply for licenses to carry a firearm as well as a firearms identification card, according to the DFW website. 

APPEALS: Anybody denied a gun permit has the right to appeal, according to state law.

GUN PROHIBITIONS

In addition to the license rules, Massachusetts has several other regulations, including: (source: Massachusetts state law).

  • Gun dealers are prohibited from selling assault weapons or large-capacity magazines (e.g. a detachable drum magazine) unless they were bought before Sept. 13, 1994. Examples of assault weapons banned: FN/FAL, Steyr-AUG, TEC-9, Uzis, and AR-15s.
  • Individuals convicted of felonies or misdemeanors that included at least a two-year jail sentence may not apply for a gun permit. Also, anybody convicted of prior gun or drug offenses or violent crimes is also prohibited.
  • Individuals who have been sent to mental health hospitals are prohibited from owning guns unless a doctor issues permission.
  • Individuals who have been treated for substance abuse are barred from owning guns unless a doctor declared the person “cured.”
  • Also, anybody against whom restraining orders have been filed against are also prohibited from having guns.

RECENTLY IMPOSED REGULATIONS

In the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, Gov. Deval Patrick has proposed new rules on guns along with Pres. Barack Obama. Obama has also issued new rules through his executive order powers. 

New Proposed State Gun Rules (Press release from Patrick)

  • Abolishing high-power ammunition.
  • Requiring background checks be performed for gun sales done at gun shows.
  • A limit of one gun purchase per month.
  • Prohibiting anybody under 21 from buying a machine gun.
  • Sharing relevant mental health information with a state database, which would more easily help federal officials perform background checks on prospective gun buyers.
  • Also, Patrick proposed an additional $5 million for increased mental health services.
  • The bill, if passed, would create four new gun crimes, which prosecutors could use to put offenders who use a gun behind bars.
  • New authority would be given to police to arrest individuals without having a warrant if they encounter a dangerous situation.
  • The bill would also increase penalties for having a gun on school grounds.

Obama’s Proposed Gun Regulations (Source: Huffington Post)

New Gun Rules Imposed by Obama (Source: Huffington Post)

  • Modifying health care privacy laws to make more mental health information available for background checks.
  • Authority for police to do background checks before returning a gun seized from its owner.
  • Federal law enforcers must now trace the origins of any gun used in a crime.
  • Increased prosecution of gun crimes.
  • Clarification of the Obama’s health care law to say doctors are allowed to ask patients whether they have a gun in their home.

What are your thoughts on the kind and number of gun permits issues in Wayland? Are you surprised at the jump in permit applications for large-capacity weapons? Let us know in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Wayland Gun Permits and gun control

JRZ

9:14 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

I really hope this is not an attempt to stir up fear and paranoia about firearms in Wayland, as has been done elsewhere. This is really a non-issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Brooklyn Lowery

12:08 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

JRZ, thanks for your thoughts. This was a pretty straightforward numbers story and wasn't intended to be any more than that. If it does "stir up fear," that is perhaps a larger question to be explored. Firearms and firearms permits have been very much in the public discourse lately and we're simply reporting the numbers ... along with what each permit allows. Had the goal been to "stir up fear," we would have left out the description for each type of permit and simply reported that there are people with machine gun permits in Wayland.

JRZ

12:44 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Drawing attention to the numbers, and particularly the "increase" in licenses, can appear alarmist. In particular, you're asking people what they think about the "jump" in licenses - when there really doesn't seem to be any; there's just a steady increase.

Also note that there is a much more important difference between Class A and Class B permits besides magazine capacity - the ability to carry a weapon for self-defense. This is almost certainly why people apply for Class A over Class B; there doesn't seem to be any reason to apply for Class B at all, so it's not surprising that Class A would be the most popular.

http://www.goal.org/masslawpages/classaandbdifference.html

Reply

SHD

6:25 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Drawing attention to the numbers is exactly what needs to be done JRZ. It is the only way to get these weapons out of people's hands and to keep people safe. NO citizen has the right to bear such a weapon; sorry, the 2nd Amendment does not protect you here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRZ

8:50 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Your response shows profound and total ignorance of this issue, really on every facet you've touched upon. It's unfortunate that people refuse to educate themselves before calling for the removal of the rights of others.

Bill

1:18 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Fact – the second amendment does protect the rights of people to own and carry guns (so say the Supreme Court – see the District of Columbia case last year) . Fact – no constitutional right is absolute (you cannot yell “fire” in a crowded theater). The government can place restrictions on fire arms – period. I am a gun owner myself and I have a Class A license to carry and I own a large capacity semi-automatic pistol. What these numbers show is I am not alone – I was under the impression I was one of a few dozen. These numbers are going to take the taboo out of ownership. What I cannot understand is if having a 10 round clip restriction MAY save 1 child – what’s the problem. So I will have to re-load at the range more often – small price to pay for ONE life. I canceled my NRA membership the day after their press conference – they represent small minded people and that is not me…..

Reply
Comment_arrow

SHD

9:20 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Fact--in 1896, in Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that 'separate but equal' institutions did not violate the constitution. In 1857, in Dred Scott v. Sanford, the Supreme Court ruled that black people were inferior to white people and "altogether unfit to associate with the right race." Sadly Bill, the Supreme Court is not infallible. It is made errors--in the eyes of history--that have caused bloodshed, violence, and extreme mistreatment. It is not unreasonable to state that they made the same mistake in the D.C. case. The Court has rarely dealt with 2nd Amendment cases--there is time for them to get it right, and to make sure that others can not own a large-capacity semi-automatic pistol as you do. That will make our community a safer place

Comment_arrow

Bill

8:17 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

DHS - Typical liberal pansy. A gun owner agrees with restrictions, wants to ban assault weapons and cancels their NRA membership and you chastise them. Have fun chasing windmills – So according to you, all owners of pistols are evil and the root of the problem. There is no such thing as responsible gun ownership? Have fun with that one. You realize, to normal people you sound as absurd as the right wing nut jobs on FOX – that is why you are ALL called extremist.

SHD

9:09 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

JRZ, ignorance is the belief that you have the fundamental right to own a firearm of any sort. Quite simply, it is not. Of course you will state its oir constitutional right--keep in mind, during the history of our nation, african-americans were counted as a 3/5 of a person for representation in Congress and women were not allowed to vote until 1920. I'm sure if you had it your way, you would love to bring those times back JRZ. Ignorance is avoiding the facts of the blight that guns are on our society. You are the problem JRZ. The blood of the kids of Newtown are on your hands JRZ

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRZ

12:18 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Wow, you really are a despicable, horrible excuse for a human being. Equating someone's desire to protect themselves and their family to a racist or sexist, as well as being responsible for children's murder? You're way beyond anything that's remotely rational.

Even though you probably deserve it, and would learn an important lesson, I certainly hope you never have the opportunity to experience the need to defend yourself from those who would do harm.

SHD

9:28 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Bill--Typical conservative gun nut. See, calling one names is easy--and helps to demonstrate that you do not have a real argument, only a pathetic attachment to guns. Let's be clear, the 'agenda' to limit gun ownership--all gun ownership--is more mainstream that you would like to believe. And Bill, while you have taken steps that MOST gun owners and activists would not take--canceling membership in NRA, being okay with further restrictions--I still believe that it is a problem that citizens can purchase and use a semi-automatic pistol, at a shooting range or anywhere else. If that is an extremist view, so be it, I can live with that label.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill

12:16 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

What is the difference between a semi-automatic pistol with a ten round capacity and a congenital pistol (besides 4 rounds). I can tell you, there is no difference. I can get off rounds just as fast with conventional pistil. All semi-automatic means is the way the next round enters the chamber. What you are after is fully-automatic large capacity. Everyone agrees with you on that – I am not sure what the argument is??

SHD

1:20 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

I guess we pretty much agree--in all seriousness, you convinced me Bill. While I still stand more firmly for gun control than you, I understand your p.o.v. better. Thanks...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Brooklyn Lowery

1:24 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Folks, this comment thread is bordering on the out-of-hand. Please, please remain civil and avoid personal attacks on one another. Firearms elicit strong opinions, which are certainly welcome here, but please stick to the issues rather than criticizing one another.

Reply

SHD

1:28 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

JRZ--I can tell from how angry you are that you are exactly the kind of person society should fear owning a gun. People with mental health disorders are those who we can least trust to own a firearm. And by the way, just for the record JRZ, it is fools such as yourself who attempt to use a firearm in self-defense in a home invasion that are more likely to be killed. Look it up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JRZ

5:39 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

You're way over the line. You don't even have a rudimentary understanding of firearms (you didn't even know what semiautomatic meant!) and yet you continue to post nonsensical, inflammatory opinions and call for the banning of things you don't understand. You really should educate yourself further. That's exactly what I did.

http://liberaltaria.com/?p=7

L Marcoccio

5:38 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Hi Brooklyn, I am a fan. I am neutral on the gun topic. I support the second amendment, freedom of speech, and safety in our schools. The way you worded your comment and question suggested that you intended to induce anger.

You and the US Press are being controlled by Washington. ALL TYPES of violence increased in schools. Bullying laws and therapy dogs will not be enough to keep violence from occurring. The fact of the matter is that our children are becoming more and more violent. We will never reduce violence by doing away with guns or making laws no one can enforce. Research clearly shows a strong relationship between children being born to mothers older than 35 years or below 16 years as having an increased perpensity to violence. Mothers with addictive genes and/or depression also spawns violent children. Other known factors are limited/no parenting, motion picture violence, and rated M electronic games violence. These grew 2000%. Without addressing these, violence in children will increase. Wash DC will do everything it can to continue to nurture its successful support from females and teacher unions. That equates to putting on a great show, but missing the mark of the real issues by a mile.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SHD

6:07 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Marcoccio, I think we can all agree that this is not a problem that can be pegged to a single issue. You are right that there are many variables that need to be considered, as you presented above. And gun control advocates often ignore the type of research you presented. On the other hand, gun supporters tend to ignore the research and statistics that demonstrate a link between the high rates of gun ownership and the violence and murder rate in our country. I think if each side did not choose to 'ignore' the evidence that does not help their personal argument, some progress could be made. Agree or disagree?

Comment_arrow

SHD

6:27 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

One other thing Marcoccio, it is helpful when you make an argument to avoid the paranoid thoughts such as "you and the US press are being controlled by Washington," and that the problem with our government is that it "will do everything it can to continue to nurture its successful support from females and teacher unions." That could give on the impression that you are an angry, white male clutching onto your gun. Last time I checked, it was sentiments like these that cost the Republicans the election back in November. Broadly stating that our government panders to women (over half our population) and teacher unions (as weak as they have ever been) does not help your argument.

SHD

5:56 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

JRZ, I have enough of an understanding to know that the easy access to guns in this country is the greatest danger to our safety and freedom. Compare us to other 'like countries' that have the same violent video games, movies, etc, the same culture of violence and so on, what separates us from them is our easy access to guns. You are right though, I don't know one weapon from the other (and am proud of it) and ultimately if that detracts from my argument, so be it--these guns still have to go. Sadly JRZ, your have a distorted view of reality--yet again, another reason why we have to be certain make sure guns do not fall into the hands of those that are mentally instable. That is at least one thing we can agree on in light of Newtown.

Reply

SHD

6:03 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

One more point JRZ...the link that you posted is so clearly from a person that was a conservative, is one, and will always be. It is usually not a good idea to take at face value the ramblings on a person's personal blog. But I suppose if that is the way you educate yourself, it tells the public all they need to know.

Reply

Leave a comment